Teenager Accused of Using Crypto to Support Al Qaeda

Last updated:

Journalist

Hassan Shittu

Journalist

Hassan Shittu

About Author

Hassan, a Cryptonews.com journalist with 6+ years of experience in Web3 journalism, brings deep knowledge across Crypto, Web3 Gaming, NFTs, and Play-to-Earn sectors. His work has appeared in…

Last updated:

Why Trust Cryptonews

With over a decade of crypto coverage, Cryptonews delivers authoritative insights you can rely on. Our veteran team of journalists and analysts combines in-depth market knowledge with hands-on testing of blockchain technologies. We maintain strict editorial standards, ensuring factual accuracy and impartial reporting on both established cryptocurrencies and emerging projects. Our longstanding presence in the industry and commitment to quality journalism make Cryptonews a trusted source in the dynamic world of digital assets. Read more about Cryptonews

According to The Standard report, a 16-year-old teenager from East London stands accused of fundraising with crypto and offering his cybersecurity expertise to Al Qaeda and other extremist groups.

The teenager, who has pleaded not guilty to all charges, is alleged to have raised approximately $1,300 in cryptocurrency and presented himself as an expert in both crypto and cyber defense, aiming to support Al Qaeda and the Pakistani Taliban.

Teenager Supports Al Qaeda Funding: Is Crypto the Problem?

Prosecutors allege the boy’s actions demonstrated an “ideological support” for terrorist groups.

Although he has been released on bail, he faces significant restrictions, including a nighttime curfew, social media bans, and strictly limited access to digital devices.

Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring transferred the case to the Old Bailey, where the boy’s next hearing is scheduled for November 2.

The court mandated that while the teenager may use his PlayStation, he is prohibited from online gaming or communicating with others on any interactive platform. The bail conditions reflect the gravity of the charges.

The case has once again brought to light the concerns over the use of cryptocurrency in illicit activities, including terror financing, and the need for a careful balance between technological advances and national security.

According to blockchain analysis firm Chainalysis, while crypto-related terrorism funding remains a small fraction of overall illicit activities, at least $24.2 billion worth of cryptocurrency was sent to illicit wallet addresses in 2023, down 40% compared to 2022.

Despite the small percentage, global authorities are taking preventative measures against terror-linked crypto transactions.

However, the transparency inherent in blockchain technology has proven an asset to law enforcement.

Every crypto transaction is permanently recorded on a public ledger, allowing agencies to track transactions and identify suspicious patterns more effectively than traditional finance channels.

Crypto is a dual-nature technology: on one hand, its decentralized nature offers financial freedom and innovation; on the other, it presents risks that national security frameworks and regulators must address vigilantly.

Internationally, governments are intensifying efforts to curb illicit crypto activities, citing the risks posed by its anonymity and cross-border accessibility.

Recent reports have shown how terrorist organizations exploit fundraising characteristics, especially given cryptocurrency’s rapid global adoption.

From law enforcement’s perspective, technological transparency could bolster regulatory measures to curb such misuse, as global coordination and regulation work to mitigate these risks.

Notably, four victims of state-sponsored terrorism have recently filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), alleging it has withheld funds owed to the Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Fund from Binance’s $4.3 billion settlement.

The lawsuit, filed in Washington, D.C., claims that under the Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act, the DOJ is legally required to deposit 100% of criminal and 75% of civil proceeds into the fund, compensating terrorism victims.

The plaintiffs assert that, despite these guidelines, only $898.6 million has been allocated to the fund, and they seek a court order mandating full compliance from the DOJ.

Similarly, UN officials at the Counter-Terrorism Committee (CTC) meeting in India recently reported that terrorist organizations are increasingly utilizing cryptocurrencies and other digital assets to finance their operations.

Svetlana Martynova, the UN’s Countering Financing of Terrorism Coordinator, noted that traditional methods like cash and hawala systems remain prevalent.

However, new payment technologies, including privacy coins, mobile payment systems, and online wallets, are increasingly exploited to obscure money trails.