South Korean National Assembly to Probe Altcoin AVAIL ‘Price Manipulation’ Case

Last updated:

Author

Tim Alper

Author

Tim Alper

About Author

Tim Alper is a British journalist and features writer who has worked at Cryptonews.com since 2018. He has written for media outlets such as the BBC, the Guardian, and Chosun Ilbo. He has also worked…

Last updated:

Why Trust Cryptonews

With over a decade of crypto coverage, Cryptonews delivers authoritative insights you can rely on. Our veteran team of journalists and analysts combines in-depth market knowledge with hands-on testing of blockchain technologies. We maintain strict editorial standards, ensuring factual accuracy and impartial reporting on both established cryptocurrencies and emerging projects. Our longstanding presence in the industry and commitment to quality journalism make Cryptonews a trusted source in the dynamic world of digital assets. Read more about Cryptonews

The South Korean National Assembly is set to investigate transactions involving the altcoin AVAIL on the crypto exchange Bithumb in July amid “price manipulation” suspicions.

Per Bloomingbit/Hanguk Kyungjae, lawmaker Min Byeong-deok, of the Democratic Party of Korea, will bring the case before an audit held by the Political Affairs Committee on October 17.

AVAIL Price Audit Begins

Min has labeled the token a “burger coin,” a variation on the moniker “kimchi coin.” Whereas the term kimchi coin refers to low-cap domestic altcoins, “burger coins” are tokens “issued overseas but listed on domestic crypto exchanges.“

Min was the first to coin the term at an audit last year. That audit focused on “circulation issues” connected with the SUI coin.

“October 17’s audit will let us address the recent controversy over AVAIL prices, as well as listing beam and manipulation suspicions on Bithumb, a platform that lists AVAIL.”

South Korean lawmaker Min Byeong-deok

The term “listing beam” refers to a phenomenon whereby the price of newly listed coins rises sharply immediately after listing before falling quickly.

A graph showing AVAIL prices over the past 12 months.
AVAIL prices over the past 12 months. (Source: CoinMarketCap)

The regulatory Financial Supervisory Service launched its own probe into the coin in early August after a flurry of suspicious transactions in late July.

The FSS thinks an unnamed investor bought “a large amount of AVAIL from overseas vendors” and then “led trading on Bithumb” on July 23.

The regulator thinks this trader drummed up support for their drive online and then tried to spike prices by executing scores of post-listing transactions.

This, the FSS believes, helped drive AVAIL prices up from around $0.17 to the $2.56 mark “in the space of around 15 minutes.”

Only AVAIL prices on Bithumb were affected, with the token’s prices remaining steady on rival exchange platforms.

A graph showing trading volumes on the Bithumb crypto exchange over the past 12 months.
Trading volumes on the Bithumb crypto exchange over the past 12 months. (Source: CoinGecko)

Lawmaker Demands Data

Min has asked financial regulators to provide the commission with “relevant data” for its audit.

This data includes “the status of abnormal transactions of AVAIL coins listed on Bithumb.”

Many think the unnamed investor “sold Avail on behalf of non-Koreans who could not use domestic crypto exchanges.”

Min’s office said:

“The price manipulation […] issues connected with the Bithumb-AVAIL price incident are the joint responsibility of the exchanges and financial authorities. They are neglecting investor protection. We will hold them accountable.”

Min has previously criticized crypto exchanges for “ignoring” the “damages” investors suffer from “burger coin” price manipulation events.

The Financial Supervisory Service’s probe is still ongoing. The regulator said it would not “disclose information” until its probe was “fully resolved.”

“Any mention of the progress of the investigation could affect market prices.”

Financial Supervisory Service

Early Test for Virtual Asset User Protection Act

Bithumb, meanwhile, has also refused to comment on the investigation so long as it remains active. It said:

“We have a system in place to report to the financial authorities on abnormal transactions, based on monitoring, as per the terms of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act.”

The act came into force in July this year. It contains clauses pertaining to investor protection and anti-price manipulation measures.

An unnamed crypto industry insider told the media outlet the case would “serve as a useful precedent for the financial authorities and investigative authorities, regardless of its outcome.”