Matthew Sigel Predicts Bullish Setup for Bitcoin as U.S. Election Looms

Last updated:

Author

Hongji Feng

Author

Hongji Feng

About Author

Hongji is a crypto and tech reporter. He graduated from Northwestern University’s Medill School of Journalism with a Bachelor’s and a Master’s. He has previously interned at HTX (Huobi Global),…

Last updated:

Why Trust Cryptonews

With over a decade of crypto coverage, Cryptonews delivers authoritative insights you can rely on. Our veteran team of journalists and analysts combines in-depth market knowledge with hands-on testing of blockchain technologies. We maintain strict editorial standards, ensuring factual accuracy and impartial reporting on both established cryptocurrencies and emerging projects. Our longstanding presence in the industry and commitment to quality journalism make Cryptonews a trusted source in the dynamic world of digital assets. Read more about Cryptonews

Bitcoin’s recent rise appears linked to political shifts and global economic concerns, according to Matthew Siegel, head of digital assets research at VanEck.

In an interview with CNBC, Siegel pointed to factors such as the upcoming U.S. election, shifts in money supply, and international developments in Bitcoin mining as influencing recent price trends.

Presidential Candidates’ Impact on Market

Regarding the upcoming U.S. presidential election on Bitcoin’s price trends, Siegel explained that Bitcoin has historically reacted to shifts in political sentiment, especially when candidates viewed as favorable toward digital assets show gains in the polls.

Recent price movements have aligned with rising betting odds for Donald Trump, the pro-crypto candidate.

“Our bet is that this is a very bullish setup for Bitcoin into the election. We saw the exact same pattern in 2020, where Bitcoin lagged with low volatility,” said Siegel. “And once a winner was announced, we had a high-vol rally as new buyers come into this market.”

Bitcoin’s Positive and Negative Correlations

He also highlighted the significance of Bitcoin’s long-term negative correlation with the U.S. dollar. Siegel stated that periods of dollar weakening often coincide with Bitcoin price increases as investors seek alternative stores of value.

Another key factor Siegel mentioned is the correlation between Bitcoin and money supply growth, especially M2, which tracks the supply of cash and readily available funds.

Siegel pointed out that recent Federal Reserve policy adjustments have led to a re-acceleration in the money supply, contributing to renewed interest in Bitcoin.

In addition, Siegel discussed the influence of global developments on Bitcoin’s adoption. He noted that some emerging markets, particularly among BRICS nations, are integrating Bitcoin mining operations supported by government resources.

Looking ahead, Siegel remarked that global debt concerns could further drive interest in Bitcoin. He suggested that if major economies face credit downgrades, particularly the U.S., this could act as a catalyst for increased investment in Bitcoin as an alternative asset.