Coinbase Achieves Partial Win in Court Battle Against SEC for Crucial Discovery

Last updated:

Author

Ruholamin Haqshanas

Author

Ruholamin Haqshanas

About Author

Ruholamin Haqshanas is a contributing crypto writer for CryptoNews. He is a crypto and finance journalist with over four years of experience. Ruholamin has been featured in several high-profile crypto…

Last updated:

Why Trust Cryptonews

With over a decade of crypto coverage, Cryptonews delivers authoritative insights you can rely on. Our veteran team of journalists and analysts combines in-depth market knowledge with hands-on testing of blockchain technologies. We maintain strict editorial standards, ensuring factual accuracy and impartial reporting on both established cryptocurrencies and emerging projects. Our longstanding presence in the industry and commitment to quality journalism make Cryptonews a trusted source in the dynamic world of digital assets. Read more about Cryptonews

Cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase has secured a partial victory against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), potentially gaining access to critical documents regarding the agency’s classification of tokens as securities.

On September 5, Judge Katherine Failla of the Southern District of New York partially granted Coinbase’s motion to compel the SEC to produce documents.

The ruling came as part of Coinbase’s ongoing legal struggle with the SEC, which began in July over the scope of document requests related to the regulator’s stance on digital assets.

SEC to Provide “Important Discovery” for Case

According to Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer, Paul Grewal, the court’s decision is expected to result in the SEC providing “important discovery” for the case.

The SEC’s enforcement action against Coinbase, filed in June 2023, accuses the exchange of operating as an unregistered securities exchange, broker, and clearing agency.

Coinbase’s motion, filed on July 23, sought documents related to the SEC’s application of securities laws to digital assets, the firm’s initial public offering, and statements made by SEC Chair Gary Gensler on digital assets.

The SEC, however, contended that Coinbase’s requests were excessively broad and sought material that was not pertinent to the civil case.

The outcome of this case is significant, not only for Coinbase but also for the broader cryptocurrency industry.

The SEC’s case against Coinbase could set a precedent for how other firms are regulated and could impact numerous ongoing enforcement actions.

For instance, a recent ruling in August found Ripple Labs liable for $125 million in a prolonged court battle with the SEC.

Coinbase’s partial legal victory coincided with another notable development: a New Jersey judge’s decision allowing a group of investors to proceed with an amended class-action lawsuit against the exchange.

The lawsuit accuses Coinbase of concealing that assets listed on its platform were likely securities, a claim that allegedly contributed to the company’s growth and revenue.

The ruling could potentially trigger a wave of similar class-action lawsuits in various jurisdictions.

SEC Under Scrutiny

Meanwhile, the SEC has been facing growing criticism due to its “regulation-by-enforcement” approach to the crypto industry.

Critics argue that the SEC has failed to establish a clear regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, opting instead to pursue legal action against key industry players.

As reported, a coalition of seven U.S. states has come together to challenge the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) regulation of cryptocurrency.

Led by Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird, the states have filed an amicus brief arguing that the SEC’s attempt to regulate cryptocurrencies constitutes a “power grab” that would stifle innovation, harm the crypto industry, and exceed the agency’s authority.

The coalition includes Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, with Oklahoma becoming the latest state to join.

Earlier this year, SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce said that the regulatory agency is currently operating in an “enforcement-only mode” when it comes to the regulation of cryptocurrencies.